Appendix C11 - Indigenous Leaning Requirement
Institutional Context and Capacity
Institutional context and capacity
Summary of previous working groups:
Group 1
- In 2011, Arts and Science adopted an Aboriginal learning goal
- It was found to receive the least attention of any learning goal
- In 2014, 79% of faculty supported an Aboriginal learning requirement
- They decided on a course-list approach, with courses from the entire college
- Criteria for the courses was established; they focused on meaningful engagement and understanding, not just content
Group 2
- Met in 2016 and had reservations about the course:
- An outdated, awareness-based pedagogy; the effect of time and changing faculty on the goals of the course; the competitiveness of creating courses
- A suite of 4 new courses was proposed, aimed at building a paradigm shift, not focused on content but on tools to engage with the historical roots of today’s realities
- They determined the course should be taken in 1st year as a foundational piece.
Institutional context:
University commitments
- On Jan 21, the University Council passed the following motion: “University Council emphatically endorses the inclusion of Indigenous (First Nations, Inuit, Métis) knowledges and experiences for the purpose of achieving meaningful and relevant learning outcomes, in all degree programs at the University of Saskatchewan.”
- The University of Saskatchewan is revising its Teaching and Learning Charter to include Indigenous education goals for all degree programs.
- The U of S has been a leader in responding to the Calls to Action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Capacity:
Considering College Capacity
How many students do we need to have meet the Indigenous Requirement?
Arts and Science currently has about 8200 undergraduate students (based on October census date, actual number is higher). In order to ensure that all students have an opportunity to achieve the Indigenous Learning Goal by graduation, about 2300 students would need to reach the goal each year.
Faculty capacity
How many of our faculty can teach or are interested in teaching Indigenous content?
We have 290 faculty members (probationary and tenured), 29 faculty members do research related to Indigenous people, and 17 faculty members that self-identify as Indigenous.
There are also sessionals who teach Indigenous-focussed courses. Over 7 in 10 faculty are either interested in including or already include Indigenous learning outcomes in their own courses (survey results).
Course Capacity
What is our current capacity to teach students about Indigenous content?
Based on department’s reports of how many courses they offer with over 75% Indigenous content, 10 departments offer such classes. They also reported the number of seats available in these courses each year: Department Capacity (# of seats available in 75% Indigenous courses each year)
| Courses | Students |
|---|---|
| Archaeology | 120 |
| Art & Art History | 165 |
| Drama | 99 |
| English | 132 |
| Geography & Planning | 210 |
| History | 338 |
| Indigenous Studies | 927 |
| Political Studies | 490 |
| Sociology | 200 |
| Women's and Gender Studies | 30 |
| Total capacity for students | 2711 |
Based on these rough numbers, we do have capacity for all our students to take one of these classes by graduation. Of course, whether these courses would meet the requirement needs further consideration.
Space Capacity
What capacity do we have to accommodate large classes to meet the Indigenous Requirement?
There are 3.5 large theatres on campus: Thorv 105 (319 students), Arts 143 (350 students), Health 1150 (505 students), and Arts 241 (338 students – available for classes in morning only). All these theatres are currently fully booked during the day with existing classes. They are available only in the evening.
Support Capacity
What capacity do we have to support students who may be disturbed or traumatized by material in a mandatory Indigenous course?
According to Student Counselling Services, there is a Trauma Guidelines working group developing guidelines for teaching potentially traumatizing material. There is also a campus wellness strategy being developed that will focus on promotion of good mental health and prevention of mental health difficulties.
The Aboriginal Students’ Centre (ASC) staff have identified that there are current identity politics around INDG 107 students coming to Gordon Oakes-Red Bear Student Centre to observe ceremonies. Indigenous students already use the ASC as a place to bring concerns about courses, but we need a clear process for student complaints and the centre is limited in terms of its capacity for Indigenous student support. Non-Indigenous students will also need a place to do if they are upset by course material.
What capacity do we have to support instructors in teaching towards the Indigenous learning goal?
The Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching and Learning (GMCTL) currently offers substantial support in course design and is growing its capacity to support Indigenizing curriculum. Indigenous Voices is a staff and faculty development initiative that aims to catalyze individual and systemic change.
There is also potential for development of support systems that exist at other universities, including workshops for involved faculty, a Speakers Bureau that provides paid Indigenous expert speakers as course resources, trauma-informed training for faculty, advisors and counsellors, and SSHRC grants to fund the evaluation of an Indigenous requirement.